Financial Swindling

How Pakistan Army Blatantly Covered up Huge Frauds

Shahwar Faryal

ISLAMABAD: How the Pakistan Army bulldozes the civilians whenever any financial fraud is detected, even if it is years old, has become evident from what happened with some of the files of military purchases which came to the Auditor General of Pakistan.

These files were provided to the AGP office when it conducted a special audit on Defense Procurements for the five-year period 1990-95.

The concerned military authorities first provided the secret files containing the details of military purchases from different countries including France, USA, Germany, UK and Sweden. But within hours these secret files were physically snatched from the auditors. They were forced to evaluate the deals based only on what they could remember after they had a look at the details for a very brief time.

This audit of major deals was done in 1996 and its report was never made public nor it was submitted to the Public Accounts Committee for examination. This important report, which found huge irregularities, was dumped.

The Directorate General of Defense Procurement (DGDP) is a joint venture organization under the Ministry of Defense and the Defense Production Division, responsible for the procurement of Defense stores from local and overseas resources. It is also responsible for formulation of policies for the procurement of Defense services.

According to one report obtained by SA Tribune the DGDP concluded a Contract no 1341/63/DGDP/PC 3 c with MS Land Rover Exports Ltd., UK on June 30, 1996 for procurement of 1,047 Land Rover Defender 90GS Jeeps at the rate of $20,889 plus 5 per cent for spares and 15 per cent for freight charges.

But it was observed from the United Field Motors vehicles catalogue, issued by the manufacturers in April 1996, that the same Land Rover Defender 90 was being sold at the rate of £9,675 each. For large orders of 100 units or more, quantity discount was also to be considered by the suppliers on case to case basis. Thus, it appeared that DGDP purchased the vehicles at a rate much higher involving an extra expenditure of $6.856 million.

The scandalous part of the entire case is that the case file of this deal was first supplied to auditors but withdrawn after a few hours and never produced again despite several requests. Non production of record to auditors was in itself a serious irregularity.

Similarly a much higher rate was paid in May 1993 to an authorized agent of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Belarus. The seller offered a price of US$ 825 but the Army paid $1,199 per piece of equipment to the firm.

In another case, three old Cessna aircraft were purchased while a much better offer was available from Learjet for 1993 models.

The AGP has asked the government to constitute an inquiry committee to look into these serious irregularities in the Defense purchases.


BACK TO
Financial Swindling