|
President Pervez Musharraf and the military are
responsible for the worsening of the conflict in
Balochistan. Tensions between the government and its
Baloch opposition have grown because of Islamabad’s
heavy-handed armed response to Baloch militancy and
its refusal to negotiate demands for political and
economic autonomy. The killing of Baloch leader Nawab
Akbar Khan Bugti in August 2006 sparked riots and will
likely lead to more confrontation. The conflict could
escalate if the government insists on seeking a
military solution to what is a political problem and
the international community, especially the U.S.,
fails to recognise the price that is involved for
security in neighbouring Afghanistan.
Tensions
with the central government are not new to Balochistan,
given the uneven distribution of power, which favors
the federation at the cost of the federal units. The
Baloch have long demanded a restructured relationship
that would transfer powers from what is seen as an
exploitative central government to the provinces. But
Musharraf’s authoritarian rule has deprived them of
participatory, representative avenues to articulate
demands and to voice grievances. Politically and
economically marginalised, many Baloch see the
insurgency as a defensive response to the perceived
colonisation of their province by the
Punjabi-dominated military.
Although regional parties still seek provincial
autonomy within a federal parliamentary democratic
framework, and there is, as yet, little support for
secession, militant sentiments could grow if Islamabad
does not reverse
ill-advised policies that include: exploitation of
Balochistan’s natural resources without giving the
province its due share; construction of further
military garrisons to strengthen an already extensive
network of military bases; and
centrally driven and controlled economic projects,
such as the Gwadar deep sea port, that do not benefit
locals but raise fears that the resulting influx of
economic migrants could make the Baloch a minority in
their homeland. While Baloch alienation is widespread,
crossing tribal, regional and class lines, the
military government insists that a few sardars (tribal
leaders) are challenging the centre’s writ, concerned
that their power base would be eroded by Islamabad’s
plans to develop Balochistan; the state therefore has
little option but to meet the challenge head on. This
failure to accept the legitimacy of grievances lies at
the heart of an increasingly intractable conflict, as
does Islamabad’s reliance on coercion and
indiscriminate force to silence dissent.
The
military government should recognise that it faces
conflict not with a handful of sardars but with a
broad-based movement for political, economic and
social empowerment. The only one way out is to end all
military action, release
political prisoners and respect constitutionally
guaranteed political freedoms.
As a
preliminary confidence-building measure, Islamabad
should implement recommendations of the Parliamentary
Committee on Balochistan, which have local support.
But a sustainable solution requires implementation, in
spirit
and substance, of constitutional provisions for
political, administrative and economic autonomy. The
federation would also be strengthened if the national
parliament were to amend the constitution, to shift
powers from an overbearing centre to the provinces.
However, centralised rule is the hallmark of
authoritarianism. Like its predecessors, this military
government is averse to democratic engagement and
powersharing, preferring to retain and consolidate
power through patron-client relations and
divide-and-rule strategies.
Reliance on the Pashtun religious parties to counter
its Baloch opposition has strengthened Pashtun
Islamist forces at the cost of the moderate Baloch.
With their chief Pakistani patron, Fazlur Rehman’s
Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam running the Balochistan
government in alliance with Musharraf’s Muslim League
(Quaid-i-Azam), a reinvigorated Afghan and Pakistani
Taliban are attacking international forces and the
Kabul government across Balochistan’s border with
Afghanistan. But the international community,
particularly the U.S. and its Western allies, seem to
ignore the domestic and regional implications of the
Balochistan conflict, instead placing their faith in a
military government that is targeting the anti-Taliban
Baloch and Pashtuns and rewarding pro-Taliban Pashtun
parties.
With
the federal government refusing to compromise with its
Baloch opponents, intent on a military solution to a
political problem and ignoring local stakeholders in
framing political and economic policies, the
directions of the conflict are clear. The military can
retain control over Balochistan’s territory through
sheer force, but it cannot defeat an insurgency that
has local support.
Still, the conflict could be resolved easily. Free and
fair elections in 2007 would restore participatory
representative institutions, reducing tensions between
the centre and the province, empowering moderate
forces and marginalising extremists in Balochistan. In
the absence of a democratic transition, however, the
militancy is unlikely to subside. The longer the
conflict continues, the higher the costs – political,
social and economic for a fragile polity.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
To
the Government of Pakistan:
1.
End reliance on a military solution in Balochistan and
quickly take the following steps to deescalate:
(a)
cease military action, send the armed forces back to
the barracks and restrict their role to guarding the
province’s land and nautical borders;
(b) withdraw the Frontier Corps, replacing it with
provincial security forces that are firmly under
provincial control;
(c)
dismantle all check posts manned by paramilitary and
other federal security agencies; and
(d)
halt construction of military bases (cantonments) and
end plans to construct additional military or
paramilitary facilities.
2.
Respect democratic freedoms by:
(a)
producing immediately all detainees before the courts
and releasing political prisoners;
(b)
ending the political role of intelligence agencies,
military and civil, and barring them from detaining
prisoners;
(c)
withdrawing travel restrictions, internal and
external, on Baloch opposition leaders and activists;
(d)
ending intimidation, torture, arbitrary arrests,
disappearances and extra-judicial killings;
(e)
allowing all political parties to function freely,
respecting the constitutionally guaranteed rights of
speech and expression, assembly, association and
movement; and
(f)
respecting the constitutional obligation to preserve
and promote distinct language and culture.
3.
Entrust the Baloch with more responsibility for their
own security by:
(a)
accepting provincial jurisdiction over law and order
and policing;
(b)
retaining Balochistan Levies, re-establishing those
that have been disbanded, reforming them into a
professional force accountable to provincial authority
and replacing them by the police only once police
reform has been enacted countrywide;
(c)
ensuring that locals are recruited to the police force
and Levies in Balochistan; and
(d)
meeting the quota for Baloch recruitment in the armed
forces and federal security agencies.
4.
Allow local and international media unhindered access
to all districts in Balochistan, including the
conflict zones.
5.
Begin immediately a dialogue with all regional and
national-level political parties on ways of solving
the crisis and create a favorable environment for such
a dialogue by:
(a)
implementing at once recommendations of the Mushahid
Hussain parliamentary subcommittee, particularly those
that pertain to revised gas royalties, social sector
expenditure by the federation as well as oil and gas
companies, and jobs for Baloch in the federal
government and its institutions;
(b)
establishing and empowering the special task force
proposed by the Mushahid Hussain subcommittee to
monitor and implement these recommendations;
(c)
revising the distribution criteria for National
Finance Commission awards to account for backwardness,
level of development, geographic size, and revenue
levels of the provinces; and
(d)
reviving the moribund Council of Common Interests,
accepting parliamentary authority over the body, and
accepting and implementing its decisions.
6.
Ensure sustainable development with local ownership
by:
(a)
meeting Baloch concerns about Gwadar Port by placing
the project under provincial government control;
ending the practice of allocating coastal lands to
security agencies; giving local fishermen unimpeded
access to their fishing grounds; revising the “master
plan” so locals are not dislocated; addressing
pressing health and education needs, with an emphasis
on new technical institutes and colleges; and
implementing job quotas for locals at the port
and related projects;
(b)
ensuring in Sui and other oil and gas extraction
projects that the well head value and natural gas
rates are on par with other provinces; renegotiating
natural gas rates and the royalty formula; encouraging
oil and gas companies
to hire and train Baloch workers and allocate funds
for social development; and consulting with the
province on privatisation of the oil and gas industry
and other state-owned enterprises; and
(c)
making the provincial government a party to all
investment and development projects.
7.
Refocus policies towards human development by:
(a)
allocating an annual financial package for social
sector development pursuant to district level
recommendations;
(b)
granting specific funds for hospitals, technical
institutions, medical colleges and universities, as
well as high schools in all districts; and (c)
developing irrigation schemes, including small dams,
for rural Balochistan, on the recommendation of the
provincial government.
To
the National Assembly: 8. Enhance provincial autonomy
and strengthen the federation by:
(a)
eliminating the Concurrent Legislative List and
devolving all its subjects to the provinces;
(b)
constituting a bipartisan parliamentary committee to
recommend, within a fixed timeframe, the transfer of
subjects from the Federal Legislative List to the
provinces, beginning with subjects in Part II of the
list; (c) enacting legislation to regulate and monitor
land allotment, sales and transfers in Gwadar; and
(d)
constituting a parliamentary committee, with an equal
number of members from the ruling and opposition
benches, to examine cases of abuse of power by
security agencies.
To
the Supreme Court:
9.
Form a high-level judicial commission to enquire into
the 26 August 2006 killing of Baloch nationalist
leader Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti.
To
the International Community:
10.
Urge the Pakistan government to immediately end
military action in Balochistan.
11.
Press the Pakistan government to end all practices
that violate international human rights standards,
including torture, arbitrary arrests, detentions, and
extra-judicial killings. |